Riverside.FM Vs Zencastr: Detailed Analysis & Insights

Sometimes, recording a remote podcast can be a difficult task.

It would be best to consider factors such as choppy audio, poor audio quality, and background noises that can ultimately frustrate your listeners.

However, training and extensive setups can be hard to come across. 

To stand out in the world of podcasting, you’ll need remote podcast recording software that records high-quality content and is relatively easy to use.

This is where Riverside.FM and Zencastr come in handy – two quality podcast software brands. 

This article comprehensively compares the two brands to help you determine which one best suits you. 

An Introduction To Riverside.FM And Zencastr

Firstly, let’s explore the similarities between the two podcast software. Both Riverside.FM and Zencastr are two web-based recording platforms that concentrate on creating an easy user experience with studio-quality audio. 

In November 2016, Josh Nielsen, an engineer, founded Zencastr. Since then, it has grown drastically and features many high-profile podcast creators on its platform.

For instance, Victor Marks from the Apple Insider Podcast and John Dee Duman from Entrepreneur On Fire. 

Riverside.FM was founded by Gideon and Nadav Keyson, it allows you to record local separate high-quality tracks for both video and audio all within your browser.

The platform’s goal is to integrate live remote features and video into the podcast recording experience, allowing you to easily diversify your content into social media live streaming and video marketing. 

Since Riverside.FM’s launch; they have attracted many high-profile clients, including TED, The New York Times, Microsoft, and Spotify. As well as influential figures such as Guy Raz, Hilary Clinton, Jay Shetty, and Gary Vaynerchuk. 

Riverside.FM isn’t only applicable to professionals; its accessible and easy-to-use tools make it perfect for podcasters of all levels. 

Both podcast software shares notable features; these include:

• Separated local track recording – Individuals are provided with a video and audio track to work on, ensuring ease when editing and mixing in post-production. Any connectivity issues drop in reception, or glitches won’t affect the tracks since they are all recorded locally, rather than over an internet connection. 
• Live video and sound monitoring – Both services allow you to monitor your guest’s cameras and microphones, and adjust levels if need be. 
• Automatic post-production – Automatically move your files once the recording has finished, and enhance and fine-tune your audio. Both services allow you to adjust the layout of your speakers and guests in the videos. 
• Live editing soundboards – On both software, you can add pre-recorded audio tracks. While Riverside.FM’s media board allows you to upload both video and audio clips, Zencastr’s soundboard only allows you to import 10 audio tracks. 
• Simple guest interface – No extensive onboarding processes or training, guests can simply connect with a click of a button. 
• Secure cloud backup – Tracks automatically upload to the cloud, and while recording your files get uploaded. 
• Automatic transcriptions – Your content is automatically transcribed, great for increasing searchability. 
• Voice over IP (VoIP) service – In the platforms themselves, text and voice chats are available – other platforms such as Skype or Zoon aren’t necessary. 

Unique Features Of Riverside.FM

The benefits of Riverside.FM includes its platform’s reliability, as well as the fact that it supplies the podcast creator with local high-quality recordings with separate video and audio tracks, all within one browser. 

Since everything required is accessible on the host and guest’s computers, extra downloads aren’t necessary. 

The audio is uncompressed and supplied in a 48 kHz WAV format, and the video resolution goes up to 4K.

When comparing the two software, this resolution is much higher, since Zencastr only records up to 1080p HD. Likewise, their video recording option is in beta; therefore, in terms of reliability Riverside.FM is the winner. 

Additional impressive features include:

• Mobile App – Wherever you go, host a recording on your Android or iOS device. From the app, guests can also join the recording. Allowing you to create podcasts anywhere and everywhere. 
• Shareable Clips – Their most recent feature, Clips, is a game changer! In just a few clicks, you can transform key moments into shareable, short clips to share across social media. 
• Up to 7 co-host/ guests per recording – Invite up to 7 guests on your podcast, controlling who joins and additional recording settings.
• Producer mode – Without being recorded, your producer can join, communicate, and monitor sessions. 
• Live call-in – During live recordings, viewers/ listeners can call in to ask questions. 
• Option to live stream – On Riverside.FM and external platforms such as Facebook, Twitter, YouTube, and Twitch. 
• Screen Sharing – Screen recording is available in full HD. 
• No extra cost for post-production – The post-production editor requires no extra costs. On the other hand, the Zencastr post-production makes you pay a fee. 
• Video and audio media board – With Riverside.FM you can add video tracks. There is also a selection of ready-to-use sound effects to record professional podcasts easily. 
• Custom branding – Dazzle guests with a custom greenroom featuring your company’s or podcast’s logo. 

Unique Features Of Zencastr 

While beta is the only video recording option available, Zencastr provides easy solutions to creators who utilize remote podcast recording software with professional features and quality all located in their browser. 

Additional features the platform offers include:

• Zencastr Video Open Beta – Available to Zencastr users is video recording. However, this remains in a beta stage; so reliability may be an issue. 
• Free option – You can choose a free option with Zencastr. Although, you will only receive limited features. 
• Available on multiple browsers – Whether you are recording on Brave, Google Chrome, or Microsoft Edge – Zencastr users can do so. 

Recording Capabilities

When choosing between Riverside.FM and Zencastr for your podcast recording needs, it’s important to look at how each platform handles recording capabilities. Both platforms have unique features for audio and video quality, as well as different limits and participant support options.

Audio and Video Quality Features

Riverside.FM supports up to 4K video resolution and records studio-quality audio at 48 kHz with an AAC codec. This ensures that both audio and video recordings are crisp, clear, and professional. It also offers separate audio and video tracks for each participant, which can greatly aid in post-production.

Zencastr, on the other hand, provides audio recording at 16-bit 44.1 kHz quality using the WAV format, which is standard but lower than Riverside’s offering. While Zencastr doesn’t support high-definition video recording, it is reliable for clean audio sessions.

Recording Limits and Participant Support

Riverside.FM allows for local recordings, meaning each participant’s audio and video are recorded directly on their devices and then uploaded. This minimizes issues like internet lag and lost data. Riverside also supports up to 8 participants per session, offering flexibility for larger discussions.

Zencastr automatically records and uploads audio, reducing setup time for users. The number of participants supported by Zencastr depends on the plan, typically ranging from 2 to ten participants. While it lacks the high-definition video recording of Riverside, it remains a strong option for audio-focused podcasts.

Editing and Production Tools

Riverside.fm and Zencastr offer distinct tools for editing and producing podcasts, with features that cater to both beginners and professionals. Here, I’ll explore the specifics of their built-in editing tools and post-production quality.

Built-In Editing Tools

Riverside.fm provides Magic Editor, which allows users to trim, polish, and rearrange segments easily. This feature saves time by automating many of the processes. Users can also make use of the media board to insert sound effects, background music, and other audio clips in real-time.

Zencastr, on the other hand, has a more basic editing soundboard. It’s designed to assist with simple edits, but it doesn’t provide the level of automation found in Riverside’s Magic Editor. This might require users to spend more time manually adjusting their recordings.

With Riverside’s more advanced tools, podcasters benefit from a streamlined workflow, allowing for quicker turnaround. The Magic Editor and media board empower users to make real-time adjustments, enhancing the overall production experience.

Post-Production Quality

Riverside.fm excels in post-production with its ability to record in 2160p video quality and separate tracks for audio and video. This separation makes it easier to clean up audio and sync video during editing. The high-quality recordings ensure a professional finish, vital for serious podcasters.

Zencastr also maintains a solid standard with its 16-bit 44.1 kHz audio quality using the WAV format. While the audio fidelity is good, it doesn’t match Riverside’s higher specifications. Additionally, Zencastr lacks the same level of video quality and multi-streaming capabilities as Riverside.

For those prioritizing high-definition video and sophisticated post-production options, Riverside is the go-to choice. Zencastr, while reliable for audio, may fall short for users needing top-tier video quality.

Collaboration and Sharing

Both Riverside.fm and Zencastr offer valuable features for podcasters focused on collaboration and sharing. They each provide unique tools for real-time collaboration and integration with social media and streaming platforms.

Real-Time Collaboration Features

Riverside.fm allows users to invite remote guests and co-hosts to join recordings through a simple link. With live video previews and the ability to virtually raise hands, it’s easy to manage interactions. Multi-track recording ensures each participant’s audio is captured separately, aiding in post-production.

Zencastr also supports remote guests and co-hosts. It provides a live chat feature, enabling real-time communication during recordings. The automatic post-production feature combines audio tracks, making collaborative editing and sharing more straightforward.

Integration with Social Media and Streaming Platforms

Riverside.fm integrates well with platforms like YouTube, Facebook, and Twitter. I can directly live stream my recordings to these platforms, expanding my audience reach. This seamless integration saves time and enhances engagement.

Zencastr, while strong in basic recording, lacks direct live streaming features. It requires manual uploads to platforms like YouTube or Twitch after recordings are completed. This can be a drawback for users looking to streamline their workflow and audience interaction.

Plans and Pricing

I will compare Riverside.fm and Zencastr’s plans and pricing to help you decide which tool suits your podcasting needs best. The details will highlight their free and paid options along with the benefits each plan offers.

Comparing Free vs Paid Options

Both Riverside.fm and Zencastr offer free and paid plans. Riverside.fm’s free plan includes recording with video limits but allows multi-track recording and some editing features. Zencastr’s free plan focuses on audio recording with standard quality and 2 guests per session.

For paid options, Riverside.fm starts at $7.50 per month when billed annually, offering higher video quality and unlimited video lengths. Zencastr’s paid plans start at $12 per month with more advanced features and higher-quality recordings.

Plan Type	Riverside.fm	Zencastr
Free Plan	Limited video time, multi-track	Audio only, 2 guests
Paid Plan	Starts at $7.50/month	Starts at $12/month

Evaluating Plan Benefits

Riverside.fm’s paid plans offer several benefits. For $15 monthly (annual billing), you get high-quality 4K video recording, live streaming, and local recording. Higher-tier plans add more features like additional hours and storage space.

Zencastr includes simple, affordable plans. At $12 per month, it offers high-quality WAV audio files, video recording, and priority support. Premium plans further enhance these features with more guest slots, longer recording times, and advanced editing tools.

Riverside.fm’s live streaming and local recording make it a robust choice for serious podcasters. Meanwhile, Zencastr’s straightforward plans appeal to those who want reliable, high-quality audio and video recording without a high price tag.

Mobile Accessibility

When choosing a podcasting tool, it’s crucial to consider how well the platform works on mobile devices. Both Riverside.fm and Zencastr offer unique features for mobile users, but there are key differences between them.

Mobile App Features

Riverside.fm provides a dedicated mobile app available on both iOS and Android platforms. This app allows users to record high-quality audio and video directly from their mobile devices.

One standout feature of the Riverside.fm app is its ability to record locally on the phone. This ensures higher quality audio even if the internet connection is weak. Additionally, the interface is user-friendly, making it easy to navigate and operate even for those who aren’t tech-savvy.

Zencastr, on the other hand, does not have a dedicated mobile app. Users must access its features through a mobile browser.

While the browser-based interface is relatively straightforward, it can lack the seamless experience provided by a dedicated app. This can result in lower audio quality and a less stable recording environment compared to Riverside.fm.

Cross-Platform Usability

Riverside.fm excels in cross-platform usability, allowing seamless switching between desktop and mobile. Users can start recording on one device and seamlessly continue on another.

This flexibility is ideal for podcasters who need to record on the go or in various settings. The app’s compatibility with both iOS and Android ensures that most mobile users are accommodated.

Zencastr, being primarily browser-based, can be accessed from any device with a web browser. This gives it a degree of cross-platform functionality, but the lack of a dedicated app may limit its practicality in mobile scenarios.

Users might face challenges with browser compatibility and performance, especially on older devices. This limitation can affect the overall recording experience, making it less reliable compared to Riverside.fm.

Customer Support and Resources

Riverside.fm and Zencastr both offer support aimed at assisting users with their podcasting needs. Consider the accessibility and quality of their customer service when choosing a platform.

Accessibility of Support

Riverside.fm provides multiple ways to reach customer support, including live chat, email, and an extensive online help center.

Their live chat is particularly useful for quick responses. I found the email support to be responsive and detailed. The help center contains articles and tutorials, which are handy for learning basic and advanced features.

In contrast, Zencastr offers support primarily through email and an online knowledge base.

The email responses are generally prompt. The knowledge base includes articles and guides that cover most troubleshooting and how-tos. Both platforms have active user communities where additional help and tips can be exchanged.

Quality of Service

The quality of customer service is crucial.

With Riverside.fm, most users praise the helpfulness and professionalism of the support team. Many reviews highlight the clear instructions and the timeliness of solutions provided.

I’ve noticed their regular updates and availability of learning resources make it easy to stay informed about new features.

Zencastr’s customer service also receives positive feedback, especially for its consistency and reliability.

User reviews often mention the thoroughness of the support, ensuring that issues are properly addressed. Despite some past hiccups in service reliability mentioned by a few users, their commitment to improving the platform is evident in their responses.

Advantages and Challenges

This section goes into the specific benefits and issues users experience when using Riverside.FM and Zencastr for podcast recording. It’s crucial to understand both the strengths and weaknesses to make an informed choice.

Advantages of Riverside.FM

Riverside.FM excels in several key areas. High audio quality is one of the main benefits, offering support up to 48 kHz audio quality using the AAC codec.

Video recording up to 4K is also a standout feature, making it ideal for video podcasts.

Local recording ensures that audio and video files are captured directly on the user’s device, substantially reducing issues like glitches or background noises.

Additionally, the platform includes a built-in AI video editor, simplifying post-production tasks.

Customer support and regular feature updates are also strong points. Many reviews highlight the excellent reliability and responsiveness of the support team, making it easier to resolve issues quickly.

Advantages of Zencastr

Zencastr provides its own set of advantages. Audio quality is maintained at a standard 16-bit 44.1 kHz using WAV format, known for preserving sound integrity. This makes it suitable for most podcasting needs.

Ease of use is another perk; users often find Zencastr straightforward to navigate, which is great for those new to podcasting.

User reviews frequently mention Zencastr’s reliability. The service is noted for fewer glitches and smoother operation.

Integrations with other software can also streamline the recording process, making it compatible with various editing tools and platforms.

Support is also commendable, with users appreciating quick responses and effective help during issues, which is essential for maintaining smooth operations.

Common User Challenges

Despite their advantages, both platforms face some common challenges.

Technical glitches can occur, affecting both Riverside.FM and Zencastr users. Problems like unexpected disconnections or audio dropouts are mentioned in several reviews.

Background noise management can be another issue. While local recording helps, it doesn’t completely eliminate ambient sounds, requiring users to ensure a quiet recording environment.

Meanwhile, customer service experiences may vary. While generally positive, some users report delays or less helpful responses during peak times or complex issues.

These platforms need regular updates and maintenance to remain reliable.

Advanced Features

Both Riverside.FM and Zencastr offer unique advanced features that cater to different podcasting needs. I will break down the key selling points for each platform.

Unique Selling Points of Riverside.FM

High-Quality Audio and Video: Riverside.FM stands out with uncompressed 48 kHz WAV audio files and up to 4K video recording. This ensures your recordings are crystal-clear.

Local Recordings: By recording locally on each participant’s device, Riverside.FM minimizes internet issues. This results in higher quality output, even if the network connection is unstable.

Real-Time Backup: Riverside.FM automatically backs up your recordings in real-time. This ensures that no data is lost, even if the recording session is interrupted.

AI Video Editing: The platform includes an AI-powered video editor. This helps streamline the editing process and makes it easier to create polished episodes.

Multi-Track Recording: Each participant’s audio and video are recorded on separate tracks. This gives you more control during the editing process.

Integrations: Riverside.FM offers seamless integration with tools like Dropbox, Google Drive, and others. This simplifies the post-production workflow.

Unique Selling Points of Zencastr

Budget-Friendly Options: Zencastr offers more affordable plans, making it accessible for podcasters on a budget. The audio quality may not match Riverside.FM, but it’s still very usable for many projects.

Easy-to-Use Interface: The platform has an intuitive interface that is straightforward, even for beginners. This reduces the learning curve and makes it easy to get started.

Magic Dust Audio Processing: This feature automatically enhances audio tracks by reducing noise and leveling volume. It helps achieve better sound quality without manual adjustments.

Cloud Recording: Unlike Riverside.FM, Zencastr records directly to the cloud. This is convenient for users concerned about local storage constraints or safety of files.

Built-in Transcription: Zencastr includes transcription services. This can save time for podcasters needing written records of their sessions.

Revoice Functionality: Revoice allows hosts to replace certain parts of the recording without redoing the entire session. This can be useful for quick fixes or adding additional content post-recording.

Final Thoughts‍

If you’re looking to record your podcast in remote locations, then choosing the right remote podcast software for your requirements is important. We have outlined the features of both Riverside.FM and Zencastre to help make this decision easier.